- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs NeoPix 444
Acer QT12 vs Philips NeoPix 444
What QT12 does better (1) and where NeoPix 444 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture2.5
Why is QT12 better than NeoPix 444?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 500 lm13×
Why is NeoPix 444 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 30,000 h4.6×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | White |
