- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs ProPix 860
Acer QT12 vs Philips ProPix 860
What QT12 does better (1) and where ProPix 860 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture3.5
Why is QT12 better than ProPix 860?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 2,600 lm2.5×
Why is ProPix 860 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 30,000 h4.6×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 2,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 4.2 kg |
| Width | — | 302 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Depth | — | 218 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
