- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs 43BHM2251 HD
Acer QT12 vs Salora 43BHM2251 HD
What QT12 does better (1) and where 43BHM2251 HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture2.1
Why is QT12 better than 43BHM2251 HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 180 lm36.1×
Why is 43BHM2251 HD better than QT12?
- Light source life6,500 h vs 50,000 h7.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 180 lm |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.27:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.81 m |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 70 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 1.5 kg |
| Height | — | 87 mm |
| Depth | — | 185 mm |
| Colours | White | Grey |
