- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs VPL-XW8100ES
Acer QT12 vs Sony VPL-XW8100ES
What QT12 does better (1) and where VPL-XW8100ES wins (4) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture8.1
Why is QT12 better than VPL-XW8100ES?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,400 lm+91%
Why is VPL-XW8100ES better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | — | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,400 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.84:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.99 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 420 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 33 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | — | 14 kg |
| Width | — | 460 mm |
| Height | — | 210 mm |
| Depth | — | 517 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
