- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs LSD300W-ST
Acer QT12 vs ViewSonic LSD300W-ST
What QT12 does better (1) and where LSD300W-ST wins (5) — every spec side by side.
6.8Picture3.9
Why is QT12 better than LSD300W-ST?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,300 lm+97%
Why is LSD300W-ST better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 60,000 h9.2×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.49:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.08 m |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 60,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.85 kg |
| Width | — | 294 mm |
| Height | — | 115 mm |
| Depth | — | 237 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
