- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs PX700HDH
Acer QT12 vs ViewSonic PX700HDH
What QT12 does better (2) and where PX700HDH wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than PX700HDH?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,700 lm+76%
- Light source life6,500 h vs 6,000 h+8%
Why is PX700HDH better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 22,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.3 m |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 300 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 6,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.4 kg |
| Width | — | 293 mm |
| Height | — | 115 mm |
| Depth | — | 221 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
