- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs X1-4K Pro
Acer QT12 vs ViewSonic X1-4K Pro
What QT12 does better (2) and where X1-4K Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than X1-4K Pro?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 2,500 lm2.6×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 0
Why is X1-4K Pro better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 60,000 h9.2×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.1:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.44 m |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 0 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 236 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 60,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 33 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.68 kg |
| Width | — | 355 mm |
| Height | — | 121 mm |
| Depth | — | 244 mm |
| Colours | White | Green |
