How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QT12 vs Titan

Acer QT12 vs XGIMI Titan

What QT12 does better (1) and where Titan wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Acer QT12
Acer · 2026QT12
1 advantage
vs
XGIMI Titan
XGIMI · 2025Titan
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$4,400
Higher score
6.8Picture9.6

Why is QT12 better than Titan?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 5,000 lm+30%

Why is Titan better than QT12?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
  5. Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

XGIMI TitanXGIMI Titan≈ US$4,4007.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm5,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—5,000,000:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10+, Dolby Vision
Dolby Vision—Yes
Colour gamut (DCI-P3)—150%
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Input lag—15 ms
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—1.8:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—60″
Largest image size—250″
Optical zoom—1.5×
Lens shift—Vertical and horizontal
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Obstacle avoidance—Yes
Automatic screen fit—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—12 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARC—Yes
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life6,500 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—32 dB
Weight—11.5 kg
Width—441 mm
Height—158 mm
Depth—345 mm
ColoursWhiteGrey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare