- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1R vs NeoPix 160
Aurzen EAZZE D1R vs Philips NeoPix 160
What EAZZE D1R does better (2) and where NeoPix 160 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Picture2.4
4.3Smart features & sound2.4
Why is EAZZE D1R better than NeoPix 160?
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 5 W2×
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm vs 250 lm+12%
Why is NeoPix 160 better than EAZZE D1R?
NeoPix 160 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 280 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.28:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.83 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 5 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 40 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 1.23 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 147 mm |
| Depth | — | 171 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
