- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ9 vs VPL-XW7000ES
JVC DLA-NZ9 vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES
What DLA-NZ9 does better (3) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Picture7.8
5.9Noise, lifetime & portability5.2
Why is DLA-NZ9 better than VPL-XW7000ES?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Fan noise24 dB vs 26 dB+8%
Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than DLA-NZ9?
- Weight25 kg vs 14 kg+79%
- Power consumption440 W vs 420 W+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 3,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.84:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 440 W | 420 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 26 dB |
| Weight | 25 kg | 14 kg |
| Width | — | 460 mm |
| Height | — | 210 mm |
| Depth | — | 517 mm |
| Colours | Blue, Yellow, Black | — |
