How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 113 vs T2 Ultra

Philips NeoPix 113 vs Wanbo T2 Ultra

What NeoPix 113 does better (3) and where T2 Ultra wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 113
Philips · 2024NeoPix 113
3 advantages≈ US$210
vs
Wanbo T2 Ultra
Wanbo · 2025T2 Ultra
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$220
Higher score

Why is NeoPix 113 better than T2 Ultra?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Weight0.4 kg vs 1.2 kg3×
  3. Audio outputYes · T2 Ultra: No

Why is T2 Ultra better than NeoPix 113?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Largest image size65″ vs 150″2.3×
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Wanbo T2 UltraWanbo T2 Ultra≈ US$2206.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—500 lm
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.35:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m2.99 m
Smallest image size65″45″
Largest image size65″150″
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare