- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TX-177 vs TX-332
Technaxx TX-177 vs Technaxx TX-332
What TX-177 does better (4) and where TX-332 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is TX-177 better than TX-332?
- Light source life40,000 h vs 30,000 h+33%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 1,000:1+50%
- Largest image size200″ vs 150″+33%
Why is TX-332 better than TX-177?
- Weight1.36 kg vs 0.8 kg+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 50″ | 27″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 70 W | — |
| Light source life | 40,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.36 kg | 0.8 kg |
| Width | 187 mm | — |
| Height | 96 mm | — |
| Depth | 234 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
