- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZIP Tri-Fold vs Luma 500
Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Kodak Luma 500
What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (1) and where Luma 500 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than Luma 500?
- Light source life5,000 h vs 500 h10×
Why is Luma 500 better than ZIP Tri-Fold?
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 150 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 5,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 400:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.57:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.26 m |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Gold | Black |
