How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FHD5000 vs VPL-XW7000ES

Celexon FHD5000 vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES

What FHD5000 does better (3) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Celexon FHD5000
Celexon · 2021FHD5000
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$25
vs
Sony VPL-XW7000ES
Sony · 2022VPL-XW7000ES
8.9Score
4 advantages
Higher score
2.4Setup & placement9.4
9.4Noise, lifetime & portability5.2

Why is FHD5000 better than VPL-XW7000ES?

  1. Power consumption130 W vs 420 W3.2×
  2. Weight2.75 kg vs 14 kg5.1×
  3. Audio outputYes · VPL-XW7000ES: No

Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than FHD5000?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Lens shiftNone vs Vertical and horizontal
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  4. Ethernet (LAN)No · FHD5000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Celexon FHD5000Celexon FHD5000≈ US$258.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
4K method—Native 4K
Display technology—LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA)
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—3,200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1—
HDR support—Yes
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.35:11.35:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—2.84:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.99 m2.99 m
Largest image size135″—
Optical zoom—2.1×
Lens shiftNoneVertical and horizontal
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption130 W420 W
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight2.75 kg14 kg
Width—460 mm
Height—210 mm
Depth—517 mm
ColoursBlack, White—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare