How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Projectors
  3. Philips NeoPix 140
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Philips NeoPix 140

10 portable & mini projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix 140 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Philips NeoPix 140
Philips · 2025
NeoPix 140
1024 × 768 (XGA)150 lmLED0.3 kg
approx. price≈ US$110
3.5

Alternatives to the NeoPix 140

Denver PR-4700
1
Denver · 2026PR-4700
11% cheaper ≈ US$95
  • Largest image size 180″ vs 65″
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Wi-Fi
  • Audio output
Magcubic L018
2
Magcubic · 2025L018
Same price ≈ US$110
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 20,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Largest image size 300″ vs 65″
Magcubic HY350
3
Magcubic · 2026HY350
4.5
18% pricier ≈ US$130
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 20,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Wi-Fi
Aurzen E1R
4
Aurzen · 2026E1R
4.0
18% pricier ≈ US$130
  • Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Autofocus
  • Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Audio output
  • Weight 0.45 kg vs 0.3 kg
SceneLights LB-100.mini
5
SceneLights · 2026LB-100.mini
5.0
11% cheaper ≈ US$95
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 200 lm vs 150 lm
  • Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Audio output
Technaxx TX-332
6
Technaxx · 2025TX-332
4.3
28% pricier ≈ US$140
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 200 lm vs 150 lm
  • Light source life 30,000 h vs 20,000 h
  • Weight 0.8 kg vs 0.3 kg
AOpen QH31s
7
AOpen · 2025QH31s
3.6
9% cheaper ≈ US$100
  • Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Built-in speakers (total output) 10 W vs 3 W
  • Light source life 30,000 h vs 20,000 h
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL
8
5.1
Same price ≈ US$110
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 200 lm vs 150 lm
  • Built-in speakers (total output) 6 W vs 3 W
  • Weight 1.25 kg vs 0.3 kg
HOKO DT2
9
HOKO · 2026DT2
9% cheaper ≈ US$100
  • Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 200 lm vs 150 lm
  • Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Audio output
NK TV340031
10
NK · 2025TV340031
3.9
31% cheaper ≈ US$75
  • Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
  • Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) 120 lm vs 150 lm
  • Weight 0.61 kg vs 0.3 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare