Alternatives to Philips NeoPix 100

10 portable & mini projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix 100 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Philips · 2024

NeoPix 100

854 × 480 (480p)LED0.8 kg

approx. price≈ US$85

Cheaper

Magcubic HY300 PRO+ 23% cheaper Newest

Denver PR-4300 2026

Alternatives to the NeoPix 100

Rollei · 2024PT-1

4.5

14% pricier ≈ US$95

Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Largest image size 200″ vs 65″
Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)

Built-in speakers (total output) 5 W vs 6 W
Weight 1.5 kg vs 0.8 kg

Compare with NeoPix 100

AOpen · 2024L20 by Acer

42% pricier ≈ US$120

Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Largest image size 100″ vs 65″

Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
Weight 0.9 kg vs 0.8 kg

Compare with NeoPix 100

Strong · 2025Q1

18% pricier ≈ US$100

Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Largest image size 120″ vs 65″

Audio output

Compare with NeoPix 100

ULTIMEA · 2024Apollo P10

19% pricier ≈ US$100

Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Weight 0.6 kg vs 0.8 kg

Built-in speakers (total output) 3 W vs 6 W
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1

Compare with NeoPix 100

Wanbo · 2024Mini Pro

17% pricier ≈ US$100

Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Largest image size 88″ vs 65″

Built-in speakers (total output) 3 W vs 6 W
Audio output

Compare with NeoPix 100

Denver · 2026PR-4300

8.4

Same price ≈ US$85

Resolution (on screen) 2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 8,000:1 vs 3,000:1
Native panel resolution 2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)

Compare with NeoPix 100

InFocus · 2025Apex Challenger IN3048SL

5.1

30% pricier ≈ US$110

Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Largest image size 100″ vs 65″

Weight 1.25 kg vs 0.8 kg

Compare with NeoPix 100

AOpen · 2024Fire Legend QH12A

3.8

42% pricier ≈ US$120

Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Built-in speakers (total output) 10 W vs 6 W
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)

Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
Weight 0.95 kg vs 0.8 kg

Compare with NeoPix 100

Magcubic · 2024HY300 PRO+

4.1

23% cheaper ≈ US$65

Resolution (on screen) 1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Built-in speakers (total output) 10 W vs 6 W
Native panel resolution 1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 854 × 480 (480p)

Compare with NeoPix 100

NK · 2025TV340031

3.9

11% cheaper ≈ US$75

Resolution (on screen) 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Weight 0.61 kg vs 0.8 kg

Built-in speakers (total output) 3 W vs 6 W
Audio output

Compare with NeoPix 100